The Mystery of Puma Punku

Tiahuanacu, Home to an Ancient Civilization in Bolivia

12 Comments
Join the Conversation
Carved Stone Block at the Site of Puma Punku - www.inkatour.com
Carved Stone Block at the Site of Puma Punku - www.inkatour.com
Puma Punku, (or Pumapunka as some describe it), stands for "Gate of the Puma". This ancient location is truly a mystery on many different levels to enthusiasts.

Like many topics related to the history of ancient civilizations, Puma Punku is most definitely considered a complexing site. Puma Punku itself is actually just a small section of a mysterious city in the Bolivian Andes called Tiahuanacu , (or Tiwanaku). There are many different ideals as to the origins of the city, still the truth remains that there are some interesting points to consider in one's own observation of how it came to be.

What is Puma Punku?

The site is located over 2 miles above sea level, and several miles from the nearest source of water, Lake Titicaca. Tiahuanacu, which is believed to have been a pilgrimage site as well as a seaport, caught the attention of a professor by the name of Arthur Ponansky in the late 19th century. He showed a special interest in Puma Punku itself, scattered about with its large stone building blocks, suggesting the structure may have fallen victim to some kind of cataclysmic event.

The age of this site is thought to be around 200 B.C.E. by the archaeological majority, but Arthur Ponansky dated it to around 15,000 B.C.E. due to the believed astronomical nature by which the site was constructed. The importance of the site to the surrounding Bolivian populous can be related to that of the great pyramids of Egypt to the Egyptians.

Inhabitants of Puma Punku

Many believe that the inhabitants of this curious location were possibly that of the Inca, or even older, the Tiahuanaco community of central South America. Questions arise involving the history of whomever truly did inhabit the area, who would have created the site prior to the invention of the wheel if pre-dating is indeed accurate.

Bodies have been discovered at the site containing traces of Hallucinogens, some of the bodies even indicating they had been sacrificed due to the state of various areas of the bodies themselves. Also the complexity of how it was created without its inhabitants' ability to write, raises many questions in the minds of enthusiasts.

The Building Blocks of Puma Punku

It's inhabitants didn't leave any written work, and yet the manner in which the building blocks were constructed it seems, would have required both planning and precision. The enormous building blocks vary in size, and are thought to weigh anywhere from 30-440 tons. Even more baffling are the style in which the blocks are cut, made to fit into each other like interlocking building blocks.

The material of the blocks also raises many questions, being that the blocks consist of an extremely hard variety of granite, more importantly, that they contain traces of a rare igneous rock by the name of Diorite, which isn't available in the immediate vicinity. More interesting still, is the manner in which the blocks were cut and shaped, which suggests the use of tools that wouldn't have been available for thousands of years after the area was created.

Unfortunately the site has been effected by quite a bit of looting, like many locations of this caliber throughout history. The most common conspiracy in the case of Puma Punku has birthed the Ancient Astronaut Theory, which implies the area was constructed by astronauts or aliens, but like other sites of this magnitude, one can expect many different speculations based on the facts at hand.

Works Cited:

“Puma Punku.” Makli.com. News Around The Globe, 6 Oct 2009.

Spriggs, Maleeka. “Puma Punku.” Weeklyworldnews.com. Weekly World News, 9 Mar 2009.

“Tiahuanaco.” World-mysteries.com. World-Mysteries.com (Mystic Places).

Leonard, Cedric R. “Tiahuanacu, The Mysterious City.” Atlantisuest.com. Atlantisquest.com,

28 Apr 2009.

Me Soaking up Inspiration =D, Alexis Garrett

Alexis Garrett - I consider myself an open minded individual with a massive excitement when it comes to learning about others without judgment or ridicule. ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 0+7?
12 Comments

Comments

Jun 13, 2010 1:57 PM
Guest :
I think it is absolutely ridiculous for anyone to state that the builders did not have a form of writing. Simply because we have to evidence of it at the moment. Theres no possible way in my mind thats something like this could have been accomplished without a highly advanced form of writing and math.
Jun 13, 2010 8:38 PM
Alexis Garrett :
Correct, it isn't right to "assume" anything really without proof. That is why I stated that they "Didn't have any written work" because none was ever found. or documented as having been found.Thank you of course for reading and taking the time to comment.
Jun 14, 2010 1:41 AM
Guest :
As for the writing, the close up photographs seem to indicate pictographs, pre-dating the Mayans and Aztecs.

As for tools, have tools been located to help shape the granite into inter-locking stones?

Also, what og the metal joining brackets similar to Delphi?
Jun 14, 2010 9:34 AM
Alexis Garrett :
I don't know which pictures your are speaking of specifically, but you are like many others when it comes to information about this site, including myself, you are drawing your own conclusions based on what you think about the facts at hand, and there is nothing wrong with that, it is fantastic to question and to formulate your opinions. That is part of what makes a mystery like this great. The truth is there just isn't any way for us to know at this time what truly happened there.
I didn't find anything in my research of the site that suggests there were any tools found. I imagine if there had been any found, then a huge part of the puzzle would be solved now wouldn't it?
I didn't research how this site was similar to Delphi or any other, so I have no idea about what you speak of. My focus was on this site and this site only, feel free to write up your own article on how they are similar. I'd love to read it!
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Jun 30, 2010 2:42 PM
Guest :
Perhaps much of the proof was destroyed by those that followed. That’s been the case for thousands of years. This site is the poster child for what is wrong with current thinking in the archeological community. It’s obvious this was a sophisticated construction; however those in the field cannot risk their careers by saying that.

Man built it with amazing technology in that epoch, perhaps with the help of entities from another civilization. We need to dig a lot more there to find the answers. That may take a lot of political wrangling but it’s the only way.
Jun 30, 2010 9:10 PM
Alexis Garrett :
You know, for the most part I agree with you. I certainly feel as though, in our investigation of certain areas over an extended period of time, that we might, damage the area, or even destroy crucial evidence. It's unfortunate, and definitely a possibility at the very least.

I personally feel there is no reason for us to stop exploring, digging, studying the area. It could very well hold secrets beyond what we have ever thought possible. And how will we ever truly know if we don't continue searching. Thank you for taking the time to read this, and for your input. =)
Aug 6, 2010 5:11 AM
Guest :
The weird fact is that not even we can re-create this even with our technology. The only stone stronger than the granite used there..... is Diamond.
Aug 8, 2010 5:53 PM
Guest :
This site has, like so many others, really caught my attention.
It's always nice to read and hear more opinions.
I just wanted to reinterate what one person mention about delphi.
I belive it's the same assumtion I've made. There are several stones
that posses, what appears to be, an 'I' shaped (like and I beam) slot
which connects two stones. This was used with some different metals
in some of the later (much later) building projects. It would essentially
interlock two stones with a piece of iron.

I understand that 'GREAT' intellect comes randomly in our species.
Einstein, Cupernicus, Archimedes, Ben Franklin, ETC. I could surmise
that that with evolution pushing man one completely brilliant person, back
then, could visualize this sort of thing. Maybe even be able to construct it
in their heads. But to organize and execute it . . . well that would require
several equally brilliant humans being born in the same area with a unified
vision at the same time. To realize the structure, tools, logistics and be able
to manufacture them as well as be charasmatic enough to inspire to populas
to participate in something they can't even begin to wrap their brain around. . .

I'm stumped,

Spectator
Aug 9, 2010 2:39 AM
Guest :
I think the people of puma punku didn't think what they were doing with the rocks was important enough to write down and keep, they might have writen things down but after you write something down(like the plans for a wall) and you finish the project you destroy the documents so it can't be recreated. Also I don't think the people of puma punku wanted to write down there history because they didn't fill it was important enough and if your history isn't writen down you can make your own history ie: emporer say I'm the son of god and no one can dispute it. The one that can read and write rule, if only a few can read and write only a few can rule. Say at one time all the people of puma punku could read and write you build your complex after your done you make it illegal to write down anything after a hundred years the writen languge has disapered just because we can't find anything writen down doest mean it never was.Egypt didn't have alot of trees so they put there writing in stone.
Aug 9, 2010 1:23 PM
Alexis Garrett :
Thanks for reading and commenting guys. I love a good healthy discussion. =)
Oct 28, 2010 7:38 PM
Guest :
It is astounding how with humanity's increasing knowledge we discover that in reality we know so little of how,when,who,or what made us one of the alpha people that we presume to be. may i say, that perhaps the answer is not in this world, and we are only a monumental experiment.
Dec 10, 2010 5:08 PM
Guest :
It seems to me that a huge amount of stones are missing. After all why put so much precision into making H shaped building blocks in order to create a third of a wall around a castle with no castle. Has anybody figured out the source of the diorite? All in all, there are too many assumptions for me to begin to have any ideas other than questions. With the complete lack of answers available one might begin to think that at some point in time a very advanced race existed that happened to be fond of some very hard rocks.
12 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement